Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12611000251921
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
27/06/2010
Date registered
8/03/2011
Date last updated
8/03/2011
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A double blinded randomised controlled study on the effect of laparoscopic excision on endometriosis
Query!
Scientific title
A double blinded randomised controlled trial on the effects of laparoscopic excision compared to placebo on pain and quality of life in women with endometriosis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
259713
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
nil
Query!
Trial acronym
nil
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Endometriosis / pelvic pain
257659
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
257839
257839
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
257840
257840
0
0
Query!
Menstruation and menopause
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Laparoscopic surgery which involves puncture of the abdomen at 4 sites, inflation of the abdomen with carbon dioxode, a review of the structures and disease and excision of the disease in the surgical arm. In the placebo surgery arm control group, scoring of disease and infusion saline fluid is used post-surgery in the placebo surgery arm. The surgery is then repeated again 6 months after the 1st surgery (crossover) with scoring and excision of disease in both groups. Therefore there is a 6 month washout period. Patients are then followed up for 1 year with interview and questionnaire.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
256730
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The control group will have surgery - 4 puncture laparoscopy with visualisation and scoring of endometriosis at the index surgery. Infusion with normal saline a drain placed in the abdomen and sent to recover as per the surgery arm. Six months later all patients undergo a second surgery, and any disease is scored and excised in the control group, as per the active surgery group.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
258698
0
Pain assessment using visual analogue scales and validated questionnaires
Query!
Assessment method [1]
258698
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
258698
0
12 months after surgery
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
258699
0
Quality of life assessed by quality of life validated questionnaires
Query!
Assessment method [2]
258699
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
258699
0
12 months from surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
264724
0
analgesia requirement by assessing total amount of medication required in the post operative period in hospital using the patient's medication charts
Query!
Assessment method [1]
264724
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
264724
0
1 week following surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
264725
0
Hospital stay by assessing hours of admission to the hospital and ward based on hospital records
Query!
Assessment method [2]
264725
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
264725
0
1 week follwing surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
264726
0
Fertility assessed by questionnaire and medical records of consultation
Query!
Assessment method [3]
264726
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
264726
0
12 months following surgery
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Pelvic pain (of greater than six months duration) with suspected endometriosis
Examination findings suggestive of endometriosis
A Ultrasound findings suggestive of an endometrioma.
B Rectal ultrasound findings suggestive of infiltrative endometriosis such as uterosacral or rectal wall involvement.
C Previous diagnostic or operative laparoscopy with visual suggestion of, or biopsy proven, disease.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Suspected diagnosis of gynaecological malignancy or its precursors.
2. Current or chronic relapsing pelvic inflammatory disease.
3. Current pregnancy.
4. Infertility and endometriosis without pelvic pain.
5. Unable to give informed consent.
6. Unable or unwilling to attend for both surgeries and for follow-up to twelve months.
7. No histological confirmation of endometriosis.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Women who met the inclusion criteria were assessed in the outpatient department of a large district general hospital. Either the consultant or research fellow conducting the clinic discussed the various options for treatment with patients. If the patient requested surgical intervention, then they were informed of the research study. Further information regarding the study was given to them by the primary researcher and included the following:
1) The format of the study, which required two surgical procedures.
2) The fact that one of their surgical procedures would be a diagnostic procedure and may not provide them with any direct medical benefit.
3) That participation in the trial was voluntary and their medical care would not be affected in any way if they did not participate.
4) That their treating doctor would be unable to give any information to them, their family, or their general practitioner until the completion of the trial period.
5) That they would not be able to see their treating doctor or ask any questions about the procedure until after the completion of the trial period.
6) That a doctor whom they had not met and was not participating in their surgical management would care for them in the post-operative setting.
7) That they would have the same drain, catheter, intravenous fluid lines and analgesia machines at each surgical intervention.
8) That they would be able to request removal of their lines and discharge themselves, pending medical suitability.
9) That they would be given written information regarding the study (see appendix B) and could discuss their participation with their partner, family or medical practitioner.
10) That they could discuss any aspect of the study with their general practitioner or other medical professional not involved with the study.
11) That at the end of the study period, they would meet the principal researcher (JA) after completing a final questionnaire and would have a full physical examination. At this time, any questions relating to the study would be addressed and the order of procedures explained to the participant.
12) A letter to the general practitioner would be sent at the conclusion of the study outlining the order of procedures, with a copy of the operation reports sent at this time.
Having met the entry criteria, women who consented to participate in the study were asked to complete an initial questionnaire providing demographic data, parity, gynaecologic and menstrual history, medical and surgical history, analgesia usage, previous treatments for suspected or confirmed endometriosis, and infertility treatments. Allocation upon randomisation was concealed by sealed opaque envelopes.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation was by computer generated randomisation blocks, with the entry number concealed in an opaque envelope. The number was then entered into a computer database, with the randomisation group being exposed after patient details were entered. Patients were listed for surgery as soon as possible after allocation. Patients were advised that they could withdraw from the study at any time without their medical care being affected.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/01/1999
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
52
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
2727
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [1]
2727
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
257216
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
257216
0
Dr Jason Abbott
Query!
Address [1]
257216
0
c/o Royal Hospital for Women, Barker St Randwick, NSW 2031
Query!
Country [1]
257216
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Jason Abbott
Query!
Address
c/o Royal Hospital for Women, Barker St Randwick, NSW 2031
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
256466
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
256466
0
Mr Ray Garry
Query!
Address [1]
256466
0
South Cleveland Hospital,
Marton Road, Middlesbrough,
Cleveland TS4 3BW
United Kingdom
Query!
Country [1]
256466
0
United Kingdom
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
259239
0
South Tees Local Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
259239
0
South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust Ethics Committee The James Cook University Hospital Marton Road Middlesbrough TS4 3BW
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
259239
0
United Kingdom
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
259239
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
259239
0
02/12/1998
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
259239
0
98/59
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Aim: To assess the role of laparoscopic excision of endometriosis in women who have confirmed disease, and assess pain and quality of life (QoL) outcomes at 6 and 12 months following surgery. Methods: A double blind randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Women were randomised to an immediate or a delayed group. In the immediate group, women received laparoscopic excision of endometriosis at the time of first surgery and then a second look laparoscopy, with or without excision of additional disease 6 months later. In the delayed surgery group, women received a staging laparoscopy without excision at the time of first surgery, followed by laparoscopic excision of endometriosis 6 months later. Pain was assessed by dichotomous and continuous variables and QoL was assessed using the EuroQOL, SF-12 and sexual activity questionnaires. Patients: 52 women with suspected endometriosis were randomised in the study. Results: Three women withdrew before surgery owing to pregnancy; three without reason and seven were excluded following surgery when endometriosis was not confirmed. The remaining 39 women were operated on and the results analyses by intention to treat. At 6 months following surgery 1, 6/19 women (32%) in the delayed surgery group reported an improvement in symptoms, and 13/19 (68%) reported no improvement in symptoms. In the immediate surgery group, 16/20 (80%) reported an improvement in symptoms, and 4/20 (20%) reported no improvement in symptoms. There was a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.002). There was a significant improvement in many aspects of quality of life for women in the immediate surgery group compared to baseline, but no significant improvement for women in the delayed surgery group. Three women in the immediate surgery group became pregnant following their first surgery and did not have surgery 2. At 6 months following surgery 2, 15/18 women (83%) in the delayed surgery group reported an improvement in symptoms, and 3/18 (17%) reported no improvement in symptoms. The other woman in this group required treatment at surgery 1 due to severe disease. In the immediate surgery group, 8/15 (53%) of women reported a change in symptoms at 6 months following surgery 2, and 7/15 women (47%) reported no improvement in symptoms. There were 3 women pregnant in this group, one withdrawal following surgery, but before final follow-up and one women who had a complication at surgery 1 and did not have second surgery. There were significant improvements in all aspects of quality of life in both groups at the end of the study compared to baseline. Conclusion: Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis for women appears to be effective in reducing pain symptoms and improving quality of life compared to placebo. Surgery is associated with a 30% placebo response rate that is not dependent on severity of disease. Approximately 20% of women do not report an improvement following surgery for endometriosis. There is a significant improvement in many aspects of quality of life following surgery for endometriosis compared to placebo.
Query!
Trial website
nil
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
31344
0
Query!
Address
31344
0
Query!
Country
31344
0
Query!
Phone
31344
0
Query!
Fax
31344
0
Query!
Email
31344
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
14591
0
A/Prof Jason Abbott
Query!
Address
14591
0
Royal Hospital for Women and University of New South Wales, Barker St, Randwick, NSW 2031
Query!
Country
14591
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
14591
0
+61293826111
Query!
Fax
14591
0
+61293826444
Query!
Email
14591
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
5519
0
A/Prof Jason Abbott
Query!
Address
5519
0
Royal Hospital for Women and University of New South Wales, Barker St, Randwick, NSW 2031
Query!
Country
5519
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
5519
0
+61293826111
Query!
Fax
5519
0
+61293826444
Query!
Email
5519
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF