Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000518066
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Date submitted
21/06/2010
Date registered
23/06/2010
Date last updated
23/06/2010
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A randomized trial comparing Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with 120W photoselective vapourization of the prostate (PVP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms
Query!
Scientific title
Laser vapourization of the prostate in men with benign prostate enlargement. Long term results and cost analysis.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
252063
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Benign prostate enlargement
257601
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
257776
257776
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Renal and Urogenital
257805
257805
0
0
Query!
Other renal and urogenital disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Laser vapourization of prostate (PVP) compared to TURP. PVP uses a 120W green light laser to vapourize prostate tissue to create an opening to allow an improved urinary flow. The procedure takes between 30 and 80 minutes. There is very little bleeding and saline can be used to washout the bladder.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
256689
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
TURP is the long established "gold standard" to improve urinary flow blocked by an enlarged prostate. An electrical current is used to remove chips of prostate. Whilst generally quicker than PVP there are risks of bleeding and fluid absorption. Saline cannot be used as an irrigant as it will not allow the passage of an electrical current.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
258645
0
The primary end point is urinary flow measured with a flow meter.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
258645
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
258645
0
Pre operation 3 months, 1 year, 5 years following surgery
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
258670
0
Improvement in clinical symptoms assessed with the International prostate symptom score (IPSS)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
258670
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
258670
0
Pre operation 3 months, 1 year, 5 years following surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
264618
0
Overall procedure costs - staff costs, theatre time, theatre disposables, pathology costs. All timings of cases will be recorded at the time of surgery and costs estimated using data provided by hospitals.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
264618
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
264618
0
At time of surgery/admission and 5 years post surgery
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Urinary flow rate < 15mls/sec, IPSS > 12
Query!
Minimum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
85
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Prostate cancer, inability to provide informed consent
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Patients offered access to trial from organisations operation waiting list. Computerized random number allocator with sealed envelopes representing either TURP or PVP
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Sealed envelopes will have numbers on to be selected by random number generator
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/09/2010
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
150
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
257156
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
257156
0
Southern Health
Query!
Address [1]
257156
0
Casey Hospital
Kangan Drive
Berwick
Vic 3806
Query!
Country [1]
257156
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Philip McCahy
Query!
Address
Department of Urology
Casey Hospital
Kangan Drive
Berwick
Vic 3806
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
256414
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
256414
0
Department of Urology, Monash Medical Centre
Query!
Address [1]
256414
0
Monash Medical Centre Moorabbin
Centre Road
East Bentleigh
Vic 3165
Query!
Country [1]
256414
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
259200
0
Southern Health
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
259200
0
Monash Medical Centre Clayton Road Clayton Vic 3168
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
259200
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
259200
0
01/07/2010
Query!
Approval date [1]
259200
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
259200
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
PVP is a new procedure that may one day be able to replace TURP as the main treatment for men with benign prostate enlargement. There has only ever been one randomized controlled trial of PVP with TURP and this was using the now outdated 80W model. Recent advice from the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has stated that PVP should only be used in the context of randomized controlled trials. We intend to assess whether the procedure has long term benefits for patients and whether it is cost efective for health providers.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
31308
0
Query!
Address
31308
0
Query!
Country
31308
0
Query!
Phone
31308
0
Query!
Fax
31308
0
Query!
Email
31308
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
14555
0
Mr Philip McCahy
Query!
Address
14555
0
Department of Urology
Casey Hospital
Kangan Drive
Berwick
Vic 3806
Query!
Country
14555
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
14555
0
+61 3 99288643
Query!
Fax
14555
0
+61 3 99288361
Query!
Email
14555
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
5483
0
Mr Philip McCahy
Query!
Address
5483
0
Department of Urology
Casey Hospital
Kangan Drive
Berwick
Vic 3806
Query!
Country
5483
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
5483
0
+61 3 99288643
Query!
Fax
5483
0
+61 3 99288361
Query!
Email
5483
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF