Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000477022
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/06/2010
Date registered
10/06/2010
Date last updated
10/06/2010
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison of Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Respiratory Outcomes Between Conventional and Protective One Lung Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Lung Resection Surgery
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Respiratory Outcomes Between Conventional and Protective One Lung Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Lung Resection Surgery for Lung Cancer
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
251965
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
lung cancer
257528
0
Query!
lung lobectomy
257529
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
257688
257688
0
0
Query!
Lung - Non small cell
Query!
Anaesthesiology
257689
257689
0
0
Query!
Other anaesthesiology
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Protective One Lung Ventilation (tidal volume 6 ml/kg, 5cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure, inspiratory oxygen partial pressure:FiO2 0.5) / continuously applied during lobectomy (approximately 60-90 minutes).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
256623
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Conventional One Lung Ventilation (tidal volume 10 ml/kg, 0 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure, FiO2 1.0 / continuously applied during lobectomy (approximately 60-90 minutes).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
258593
0
respiratory parameters(airway pressure, tidal volume, inspiratory oxygen partial pressure:FiO2, respiratory rate) measured by pneumotachometer
Query!
Assessment method [1]
258593
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
258593
0
baseline = baseline time after anesthetic induction and before ventilation strategy application; OLV 15 and OLV 60 = 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of OLV, respectively; two lung ventilation(TLV) 15 = 15 minutes after the end of OLV
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
258594
0
arterial blood gas analysis: arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbondioxide (PaCO2), pH
Query!
Assessment method [2]
258594
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
258594
0
baseline = baseline time after anesthetic induction and before ventilation strategy application; OLV 15 and OLV 60 = 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of OLV, respectively; TLV 15 = 15 minutes after the end of OLV
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
258595
0
blood interleukin 6
Query!
Assessment method [3]
258595
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
258595
0
baseline = baseline time after anesthetic induction and before ventilation strategy application; OLV 60 = 60 minutes after initiation of OLV; TLV 15 = 15 minutes after the end of OLV
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
264486
0
blood malondialdehyde
Query!
Assessment method [1]
264486
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
264486
0
baseline = baseline time after anesthetic induction and before ventilation strategy application; OLV 60 = 60 minutes after initiation of OLV; TLV 15 = 15 minutes after the end of OLV
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
264487
0
hospital stay through data linkage to patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [2]
264487
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
264487
0
when patients' discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
264488
0
chest radiograph
Query!
Assessment method [3]
264488
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
264488
0
every day for 1 week postoperatively
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status 1-2 and scheduled for an elective video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy due to lung cancer
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
patient’s refusal to take part in the study, coexisting chronic obstructive lung disease with forced expiratory volume in 1 s of less than 80% of predicted and/or forced expiratory volume in 1 s over forced vital capacity ratio of less than 0.7, chronic renal failure, altered liver function, preoperative corticosteroid treatment during one month before operation, elevated temperature or leukocyte count, or any new pulmonary infiltration on the chest radiography (CXR).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
computerised sequence generation
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2009
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
2688
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
State/province [1]
2688
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
257111
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
257111
0
Samsung Medical Center Clinical Research Development Program grant, CRS110-07-1
Query!
Address [1]
257111
0
50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea
Query!
Country [1]
257111
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Jie Ae Kim
Query!
Address
Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine. Samsung Medical Center, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea
Query!
Country
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
256373
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
256373
0
Hyun Joo Ahn
Query!
Address [1]
256373
0
Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine. Samsung Medical Center, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea
Query!
Country [1]
256373
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
259152
0
Institutional review board
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
259152
0
50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
259152
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
259152
0
03/01/2009
Query!
Approval date [1]
259152
0
07/02/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
259152
0
2009-01-043-001
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study compared inflammatory and oxidative stress, and respiratory outcomes between conventional and protective OLV in patients with normal lung function undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy due to lung cancer. Fifty ASA 1-2 patients undergoing elective VATS lobectomy were randomly assigned into conventional (CV: tidal volume 10 ml/kg, FiO2 1.0, zero positive end-expiratory pressure under volume-controlled ventilation) or protective (PV: tidal volume 6 ml/kg, FiO2 0.5, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cmH2O under pressure-controlled ventilation) OLV group. Respiratory parameters, arterial blood gases, blood malondialdehyde (MDA) and interleukin 6 (IL 6) were analyzed at baseline, 15 min and 60 min after OLV (OLV 15 and OLV 60, respectively), and 15 min after the restoration of two lung ventilation (TLV 15). Postoperative chest radiography (CXR) and respiratory outcomes were also evaluated.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
31269
0
Query!
Address
31269
0
Query!
Country
31269
0
Query!
Phone
31269
0
Query!
Fax
31269
0
Query!
Email
31269
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
14516
0
Jie Ae Kim
Query!
Address
14516
0
Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine. Samsung Medical Center, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea
Query!
Country
14516
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Phone
14516
0
82-2-3410-0363
Query!
Fax
14516
0
Query!
Email
14516
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
5444
0
Jie Ae Kim
Query!
Address
5444
0
Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine. Samsung Medical Center, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea
Query!
Country
5444
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Phone
5444
0
82-2-3410-0363
Query!
Fax
5444
0
Query!
Email
5444
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Dimensions AI
Comparison between Conventional and Protective One-Lung Ventilation for Ventilator-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
2012
https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x1204000505
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF