Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000424000
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
24/05/2010
Date registered
26/05/2010
Date last updated
12/07/2012
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Satisfaction of hearing aids users, with severe to profound hearing loss
Query!
Scientific title
Satisfaction of hearing aids users, with severe to profound hearing loss
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
251844
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
nil
Query!
Trial acronym
nil
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
hearing loss
257441
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Ear
257590
257590
0
0
Query!
Deafness
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
56 individuals, with ages ranging from 18 to 86 years-old, with severe and profound hearing loss, from a granted program of hearing aids were submitted to the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire. The study was conducted between May and August 2009. The researchers readed the questions aloud and registered the responses to the instrument used, to minimize the difficulties related to hearing loss on understanding the questions - it lasted about five minutes. From these responses, were calculated the global mean, subscale and questions means. The emphasis was to the questions that results in the highest and lowest averages.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
256539
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
nil
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
258508
0
To verify if the users believed that the hearing aid minimized their difficulties and if it helped them to understand the speech.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
258508
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
258508
0
3 or more months after the hearing aids fitting
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
264309
0
To verify if they feel more confident and able with the use of amplification and what's the problems with the use of amplification.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
264309
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
264309
0
3 or more months after the hearing aids fitting
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
individuals with age superior to 18 years-old, with severe and profound hearing loss on both ears, from a granted program of hearing, aids fitted, minimally, 3 months ago.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
86
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
neurological problems, not using the hearing aids.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Psychosocial
Query!
Duration
Cross-sectional
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Retrospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
8/05/2009
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
56
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
2652
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [1]
2652
0
Rio Grande do Sul
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
257032
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
257032
0
Federal University of Santa Maria
Query!
Address [1]
257032
0
Camobi, Km 9 - Campi
Santa Maria - RS
CEP: 97105-900
Query!
Country [1]
257032
0
Brazil
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Bolsa fundo de Incentivo a Extensao
Query!
Address
Federal University of Santa Maria
Camobi, Km 9 - Campi
Santa Maria - RS
CEP: 97105-900
Query!
Country
Brazil
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
256288
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
256288
0
Query!
Address [1]
256288
0
Query!
Country [1]
256288
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
259047
0
Ethics Comitee of Federal University of Santa Maria
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
259047
0
Roraima Avenue, 1000, 702 Santa Maria - RS CEP: 97105-900
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
259047
0
Brazil
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
259047
0
05/12/2006
Query!
Approval date [1]
259047
0
05/12/2006
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
259047
0
0138.0.243.246-06
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Introdution: it’s necessary to analyze the effectiveness of hearing aid fitting, considering the amplification’s need and difficulty in communication. Purpose: To analyze the satisfaction of adults and elderly, hearing aid users, with severe and profound hearing loss, by a questionnaire and research the factors that can difficult the adaptation. Methods: 56 individuals, aged between 18 and 86 years-old, with severe and profound hearing loss, from a granted program of hearing aids were submitted to the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire. From these, were calculated global mean, subscale and questions means. The emphasis was to the questions that results in the highest and lowest averages. Results: the sample comprised by 58,9% women and 41,1% men, about 55% patients with severe hearing loss and 45% profound. 87,5% reported use the hearing aids by 8 daily hours or more. The users believe that the hearing aids were the best option to minimize their deficiency and that it help them on speech comprehension. They feel more confident and able using the amplification and refer good customer service by professionals. The performance on the phone was the encountered problem. Conclusions: the patients demonstrated high satisfaction level. The degree of hearing loss, as well as the incompatibility between phone and telecoil’s systems and the difficulty on phone’s position are factors that difficult the good performance on the phone. The severe and profound hearing loss collaborate that the hearing aids were an integral part of the day and essential on communication’s help to this population.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
31211
0
Query!
Address
31211
0
Query!
Country
31211
0
Query!
Phone
31211
0
Query!
Fax
31211
0
Query!
Email
31211
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
14458
0
Alexandre Hundertmarck Lessa
Query!
Address
14458
0
Conde de Porto Alegre, 961, ap. 801
Santa Maria - RS
CEP: 97105-900
Query!
Country
14458
0
Brazil
Query!
Phone
14458
0
+55 55 84329337
Query!
Fax
14458
0
Query!
Email
14458
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
5386
0
Alexandre Hundertmarck Lessa
Query!
Address
5386
0
Conde de Porto Alegre, 961, ap. 801
Santa Maria - RS
CEP: 97105-900
Query!
Country
5386
0
Brazil
Query!
Phone
5386
0
+55 55 84329337
Query!
Fax
5386
0
Query!
Email
5386
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF