Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000187044
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/02/2010
Date registered
2/03/2010
Date last updated
2/09/2010
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A comparison of the efficacy of corticosteroid and anaesthetic injection into the glenohumeral joint with and without hydrodilatation in patients with frozen shoulders.
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of pain and movement scores in patients with adhesive capsulitis post treatment with corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection into the glenohumeral joint with and without hydrodilatation
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
1446
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Patients with adhesive capsulitis within the ages of 18 and 90 years with exclusion criteria.
256797
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
256951
256951
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Corticosteroid and local anaesthetic combination injection with and without hydrodilatation. The injection will contain 2mL of 2% lignocaine and 1mL of bethamethasone. The procedure is performed initially by having the patient lie in the supine position. The overlying skin of the affected shoulder is cleaned with anti-septic solution. Sterile gloves are used. The hydrodilatation technique would involve the insertion of a 22G needle of variant length(dependent on patient size) from an anterior approach into the glenohumeral joint guided by a small infusion of radio-opaque contrast material. A 22G smaller needle is used in order to prevent leakage of contrast which may obscure the visualisation of radio opaque material within capsule. The position is then confirmed on imaging intensifier. Normal saline will continue to be injected until arthrographic distension or capsular rupture is achieved with a volume of at least 30mL(used by previous studies). The treatment is only administered once in a brief session of approximately 5 minutes and patients followed up at weeks 4,8 and 12 post-treatment. It is proven that physiotherapy following hydrodilatation is not shown to be beneficial in terms of pain, function and quality of life. We have therefore provided patients with a daily self-assisted exercise programme that many clinicians instruct the patients to follow in order to maintain range of movement post-treatment. This mainly involves passive range of movement exercises such as passive external rotation and pendular exercises for the upper limbs.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
256005
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Corticosteroid and local anaesthetic combination injection with and without hydrodilatation
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
257824
0
measurement of pain scores,Shoulder Pain and Disability Index or SPADI score
Query!
Assessment method [1]
257824
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
257824
0
up to 12 weeks following randomised treatment of the injection involving weeks 4, 8 and 12 post-treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
263241
0
measurement of range of movement of the affected shoulder assessed using the plurimeter.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
263241
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
263241
0
up to 12 weeks post randomised treatment involving weeks 4,8 and 12 post-treatment.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
patients with adhesive capsulitis with a
-generalised limitation of glenohumeral motion with pain at rest or on movement in 2 or more planes and with a limited range of movement of less than 30 degrees.
-duration of symptoms greater than 3 months
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
90
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Osteoarthritis, systemic inflammatory disorder – rheumatoid arthritis, previous surgery within 6 months, pregnant, rotator cuff disease, referred pain from cervical spine, contraindications to the procedure: warfarin, contrast allergy, trauma within the last six months of presentation, mental illness, fibromyalgia
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Referrals from orthopaedic and rheumatology outpatient clinics and private consulting rooms. The referrals of candidates will be assessed by a clinician for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The allocation will be in sealed opaque envelopes.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Patients will be randomised in one of two groups using a computer generated randomisation sequence and the allocation will be in sealed opaque envelopes.
Patients and clinicians will be blinded during the study.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
15/07/2010
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
256508
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
256508
0
Dr.Kishen Narayanasamy
Query!
Address [1]
256508
0
Southern Health, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168 VIC
Query!
Country [1]
256508
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr.Kishen Narayanasamy
Query!
Address
Southern Health, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168 VIC
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
255818
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
255818
0
Query!
Address [1]
255818
0
Query!
Country [1]
255818
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
258555
0
Southern Health Human Research Ethics Committee B
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
258555
0
Research Directorate Level 4, Main Block, Monash Medical Centre 246 Clayton Road CLAYTON VIC 3168
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
258555
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
258555
0
04/02/2010
Query!
Approval date [1]
258555
0
25/05/2010
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
258555
0
10025B
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Background Frozen shoulder is a common problem, affecting up to 5% of the population, leaving long-term disability and hence impairing the quality of life of patients. It still remains to be an ill defined term. There have been various methods for the management of ‘frozen shoulders’ namely: analgesia; hydrodilatation;corticosteroid injections; manipulation; and arthroscopic release of contractures. There have been increasing and equivocal evidence with regards to the efficacy of hydrodilatation for the management of adhesive capsulitis. The effects of hydrodilatation have been shown to improve pain and range of movement from the effects of capsular distension in some prospective studies. Previous trials have shown negative results which may have been undermined from an inadequate designed trial or technique. Aims and hypothesis To investigate the clinical significance of the effect of hydrodilatation. This raises our clinical research question as to whether hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection is the superior form of treatment. Whether the outcome shows superiority of the treatment or not, this would have an impact on the way clinicians manage their patients with frozen shoulders. Above all, the emphasis is on the outcome for patients. Healthcare policies may alter based on the findings. Method Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups. These two groups are patients receiving corticosteroid and local anaesthetic with and without hydrodilatation. Allocation concealment will be ensured. Patients referred to Monash Medical Centre, Clayton rheumatology outpatients department with suspected ‘frozen shoulder’ will be screened. Written and verbal informed consent will be obtained.Inclusion criteria: limitation of shoulder motion with pain at rest or on movement, duration of symptoms over 3 months. Exclusion criteria: Osteoarthritis, systemic inflammatory disorder, previous surgery within 6 months, pregnant, rotator cuff disease, referred pain from spine. Contraindications to the procedure: mental illness, age<18yo. Technique The patient lies down and the overlying skin of the affected shoulder is sterilised The hydrodilatation technique involves the insertion of a needle from the front by a radiologist into the shoulder joint guided by a small infusion of contrast material confirmed on plain Xray. The injection for hydrodilatation,containing normal saline, will continue to be injected until distension is achieved. Post treatment patients will receive a daily self-assisted exercise programme. This will be a double blinded randomization study where patients are not aware of what treatments they are receiving and clinicians evaluating patients at weeks 4,8 and 12 will not know which two groups of patients are being treated.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30829
0
Query!
Address
30829
0
Query!
Country
30829
0
Query!
Phone
30829
0
Query!
Fax
30829
0
Query!
Email
30829
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
14076
0
Dr.Kishen Narayanasamy
Query!
Address
14076
0
Department of Orthopaedics, Monash Medical Centre,246 Clayton Road, Clayton, 3168 VIC
Query!
Country
14076
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
14076
0
+613-95946666
Query!
Fax
14076
0
Query!
Email
14076
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
5004
0
A/Prof. Bell, Melbourne Shoulder and Elbow Centre and Monash University.
Query!
Address
5004
0
31 Normanby St. Brighton 3186.
Query!
Country
5004
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
5004
0
+613-95923775
Query!
Fax
5004
0
Query!
Email
5004
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF