Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000971033
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
11/11/2010
Date registered
11/11/2010
Date last updated
10/04/2012
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Does meal composition affect the ability to detect changes in appetite regulation in a laboratory setting?
Query!
Scientific title
Small vs. large buffet meals: A methodological study investigating the effect of food choice at an ad libitum meal on the ability to detect changes in appetite within a laboratory setting.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
253071
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Overweight/Obesity
252355
0
Query!
Diet & nutrition
252359
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Diet and Nutrition
256544
256544
0
0
Query!
Obesity
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This trial will investigate the effect of meal size and choice on energy intake at an ad libitum buffet lunch following 2 test meal challenges comprising (i) a low-energy, hunger-inducing test breakfast and (ii) a high-energy, hunger-suppressing test breakfast.
The trial design will be a 4 arm cross-over, single day intervention study comprising 30 healthy lean male subjects (aged 18-60 years). Participants will be given either a low energy (0.5MJ) or high energy (4.0MJ) test breakfast (matched for protein, fat and carbohydrate (CHO) composition (energy %)), followed by either a restricted, or multi-item buffet lunch 3 hours later. There will be a minimum washout period of 2 days in between interventions.
Each participant will complete all study arms in a randomized order according to a Latin square design.
The 4 interventions are:
1. Low energy (0.5MJ) breakfast, followed by restricted-item ad libitum lunch meal.
2. Low energy (0.5MJ) breakfast, followed by multi-item ad libitum lunch meal.
3. High energy (4.0MJ) breakfast, followed by restricted-item ad libitum lunch meal.
4. High energy (4.0MJ) breakfast, followed by multi-item ad libitum lunch meal.
The breakfast meals will comprise typical breakfast food items consumed in New Zealand. The macronutrient compositions of the breakfasts will be:
1. Hunger-inducing Breakfast (0.5MJ)~30% Fat; ~55% CHO; 12-15% Protein.
2. Hunger-suppressing Breakfast (4.0MJ) ~30% Fat; ~55% CHO; 12-15% Protein.
All breakfast items provided must be consumed by participants.
The ad libitum lunch will comprise either a restricted-item buffet or a multi-item buffet. The multi-item buffet will comprise a hot savoury dish, a sandwich option, a sweet option, fruit and water. The restricted-item lunch will comprise the hot savoury dish, plus water. The macronutrient composition of both buffet meals will be approximately: Fat 20-30%; Protein 10-20% and Carbohydrate 50-60%.
Both buffet lunch meals will provide items served in moderate excess and participants will be instructed to eat as much of all food items available until they feel comfortably full.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
255667
0
Behaviour
Query!
Intervention code [2]
257590
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Intervention code [3]
257591
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No Applicable
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
253427
0
The primary outcome is energy intake at the ad libitum lunch meal following the test meal (hunger-inducing or hunger-suppressing breakfasts). Lunch items will be weighed by research staff pre- and post-meal, and energy, fat, carbohydrate and protein intake calculated using the dietary program Foodworks
Query!
Assessment method [1]
253427
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
253427
0
180 minutes post-treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
262549
0
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for hunger and fullness.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
262549
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
262549
0
t= -5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270 and 330 mins. These time points are set assuming t=0 is the time the breakfast meal is administered. Therefore any negative time points refer to a VAS measurement taken that many minutes before the breakfast meal. Positive time points are for VAS measurements at that number of minutes post-breakfast.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
262550
0
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for satisfaction and thoughts of food.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
262550
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
262550
0
t= -5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270 and 330 mins. These time points are set assuming t=0 is the time the breakfast meal is administered. Therefore any negative time points refer to a VAS measurement taken that many minutes before the breakfast meal. Positive time points are for VAS measurements at that number of minutes post-breakfast.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Male
2. Age 18-60 years.
3. Lean (as defined by BMI in the range of 18-25 kg/m²).
4.Healthy, as ascertained by self-report.
5. Desire to participate in clinical trial.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Significant endocrine, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, metabolic disease or cancer/s including a history of these diseases as determined by the study physician.
2. Smokers or ex-smokers who had quit within the previous 6 months.
3. Weight loss/gain of 5kg within the previous 6 months.
4. Taking part in an active diet program such as Jenny Craig, Weight Watchers, Slim Sure, Atkins Diet, South Beach Diet etc.
5. Taking medications for weight loss or other conditions known to affect appetite regulation.
6. Any medical conditions known to affect appetite related research parameters.
7. Depression or any other anxiety disorder known to affect appetite.
8. Hypersensitivities or allergies to any foods or ingredients included in the study.
9. Blood Pressure > 160/90 mmHg.
10. Unwilling/unable to comply with study protocol.
11. Participating in another clinical intervention trial.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
This is a randomised, cross-over trial. Randomisation is carried out using a Latin square design, whereby next patient registered is allocated to the sequential randomisation code.
All subjects complete all 4 intervention arms. The order in which they are randomized determines the order that they will be presented with each treatment.
Allocation is not concealed
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
A Latin square will be used to randomise the subjects to each of the 4 intervention arms. Each participant is randomized to complete all 4 intervention arms.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
25/03/2010
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
2357
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
2357
0
Auckland
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
256145
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
256145
0
University of Auckland
Query!
Address [1]
256145
0
Human Nutrition Unit
University of Auckland
18 Carrick Place
Mt Eden
Auckland 1024
Query!
Country [1]
256145
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Auckland
Query!
Address
Human Nutrition Unit
University of Auckland
18 Carrick Place
Mt Eden
Auckland 1024
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
251488
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
251488
0
Query!
Address [1]
251488
0
Query!
Country [1]
251488
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
258239
0
Northern X Regional Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
258239
0
3rd floor Unisys Building 650 Great South Rd Penrose 1051 Private Bag 92-522 Wellesley St Auckland 1010
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
258239
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
258239
0
26/06/2009
Query!
Approval date [1]
258239
0
01/12/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
258239
0
NTX/09/08/072
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
In the study of appetite regulation preload studies are commonly used to assess effects of the energy and macronutrient composition of a meal on subsequent hunger and food intake. In the most commonly used protocol a fixed meal containing a nutrient to be tested is given, followed several hours later by measurement of the energy consumed at an outcome meal. The participants are asked to eat freely from this meal until they are comfortably full – this is termed an ad libitum meal. If the test nutrient decreases hunger it is hypothesised that this can be detected by a decrease in energy intake at this meal. However, despite the importance of the ad lib lunch meal in appetite studies, and the wide use of this method throughout the scientific literature, there is no consensus as to the ideal composition of the meal. For example, it is not known whether the type and choice of foods offered may enhance or restrict the ability to detect changes of hunger induced by a prior test meal. It has been suggested that satiety (=feelings of fullness and decreased desire to eat) may be specific to individual sensory properties of food i.e. repeated consumption of a single food item quickly leads to decreased hunger and increased fullness and hence greater satiety. A greater variety of food items provided may be expected to result in greater intake at a meal setting. This phenomenon has become termed “sensory-specific satiety” (SSS). The predominance of data identifying the physiological mechanisms which underpin appetite control and the influence of food and nutrients on energy intake has been collected from trials run within a laboratory setting. Despite the preponderance of data in the scientific literature, a number of methodological issues within these trials remain unresolved including the design of outcome meals with the ability to discriminate changes in hunger and satiety through a behavioural change, i.e. food intake.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30593
0
Query!
Address
30593
0
Query!
Country
30593
0
Query!
Phone
30593
0
Query!
Fax
30593
0
Query!
Email
30593
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13840
0
Katy Wiessing
Query!
Address
13840
0
Human Nutrition Unit
University of Auckland
18 Carrick Place
Mt Eden
Auckland 1024
Query!
Country
13840
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
13840
0
+64 9 630 3744
Query!
Fax
13840
0
+64 9630 5764
Query!
Email
13840
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4768
0
Dr Sally Poppitt
Query!
Address
4768
0
Human Nutrition Unit
University of Auckland
18 Carrick Place
Mt Eden
Auckland 1024
Query!
Country
4768
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
4768
0
+64 9 630 5160
Query!
Fax
4768
0
+64 9 630 5764
Query!
Email
4768
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF