Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609000516280
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
29/05/2009
Date registered
30/06/2009
Date last updated
30/06/2009
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The cosmetic outcome of laparotomy incisions using the diathermy scalpel: a double blinded randomised clinical trial
Query!
Scientific title
Do patients requiring laparotomy when incised with diathermy scalpel on cutting current compared with standard scalpel blade have comparable outcome with regards to scar cosmesis?
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Laparotomy scar cosmesis
4881
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
237233
237233
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
creating laparotomy incision on the skin surface using the flat stainless-steel diathermy blade on 40W pure-cutting current. Diathermy blade has blunt tip and produces cutting effect by vaporising cells. Half of the incision is done using the diathermy blade and surface incision time requires only few seconds
Query!
Intervention code [1]
236668
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
standard stainless steel scalpel with sharpened edge physically cuts the skin. Half of the incision is done using this standard scalpel and surface incision time is similar to the diathermy technique of few seconds
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
238048
0
visual analogue scale assessing cosmesis
Query!
Assessment method [1]
238048
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
238048
0
One-off measurement at 60 days following the laparotomy of the last recruited patient.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
242233
0
Likert scale asessing cosmesis
Query!
Assessment method [1]
242233
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
242233
0
One-off measurement at 60 days following the laparotomy of the last recruited patient.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
242234
0
wound complications including wound dehiscence, incisional hernia, keloid formation, are recorded based on clinical assessment by surgeon at follow-up. Patients were specifically questioned regarding experiences of chronic pain or altered sensations.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
242234
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
242234
0
throughout the trial for a minimum of 60 days and for up to 720 days following laparotomy
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
adults requiring laparotomy for colorectal resection at the John Hunter Hospital, able to give informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
previous laparotomy scar, patients requiring laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted surgery
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
patients are invited to participate in the trial following the consent for the operation required and are ensured that their participation or refusal of the trial will not affect their treatment. Treatment allocation are based on computer generated sequence to ensure approximately equal number in each group. The allocation is revealed to the surgeon immediately prior to the operation by a third party by referring to the randomisation table.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
the sequence is computer generated random numbers that are either odd or even representing the two arms of the randomisation.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
each patients served as their own control with the full length of the scar approximately divided by two at the level of the umbilicus. Each patient receive half of the length of the skin incision with diathermy and the other half with standard surgical scalpel. Randomisation determines whether the upper or the lower half receives the intervention.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
16/01/2006
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
21
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
5057
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
5057
0
Stehphen Ridley Smith
Query!
Address [1]
5057
0
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Divison of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Lookout Road, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305
Query!
Country [1]
5057
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Stephen Ridely Smith
Query!
Address
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Division of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Lookout Road, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
4566
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
4566
0
Jenny Yang
Query!
Address [1]
4566
0
29 Kalora Crescent, Charlestown, NSW, 2290
Query!
Country [1]
4566
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
706
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
706
0
University of Newcastle
Query!
Address [1]
706
0
University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308
Query!
Country [1]
706
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
239152
0
Hunter New England Area Health Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
239152
0
Hunter New England Area Health Research Ethics Unit. Administration Building Lookout Road, New Lambton, NSW, 2305
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
239152
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
239152
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
239152
0
01/03/2005
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
239152
0
HNEAHREC 02/10/16/13.05
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The main purpose of the study is to compare the difference, if any, in the appearance of the surgical scar between the the diathermy blade and the standard surgical steel scalpel. The blunt diathermy blade produces a cutting effect by passing electric current and vaporise the skin cells while the standard surgical scalpel physically cuts the skin. Anecdotal experience suggest there is no difference in the appearance of the scar between the two instruments. However, the sharp surgical blade remains in common use, albeit almost exclusively for skin incision only in modern day abdominal surgery, because the general perception is that the diathermy will cause charring of the skin and thus results in poorer scar appearance. The presence of the sharp blade poses significant and potentially avoidable risk of sharps injury to the entire surgical team. The study hypothesis is that there are no visible difference in the appearance of the scar between the diathermy and the scalpel.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
29668
0
Query!
Address
29668
0
Query!
Country
29668
0
Query!
Phone
29668
0
Query!
Fax
29668
0
Query!
Email
29668
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
12915
0
Dr Stephen Smith
Query!
Address
12915
0
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Division of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital. Lookout Road, New Lambton, NSW, 2305
Query!
Country
12915
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
12915
0
+61 2 49855568
Query!
Fax
12915
0
Query!
Email
12915
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
3843
0
Dr Stephen Smith
Query!
Address
3843
0
Department of Colorectall Surgery, Division of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Lookout Road, New Lambton, NSW, 2305
Query!
Country
3843
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
3843
0
+61 2 49855568
Query!
Fax
3843
0
Query!
Email
3843
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF