Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01063855
Registration number
NCT01063855
Ethics application status
Date submitted
4/02/2010
Date registered
5/02/2010
Date last updated
24/01/2013
Titles & IDs
Public title
Concomitant Use of PriLigy in Men Treated for Erectile Dysfunction
Query!
Scientific title
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Dapoxetine in Men With Premature Ejaculation and Concomitant Erectile Dysfunction Treated With a Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
R096769PRE3008
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CR016486
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
COUPLE
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Erectile Dysfunction
0
0
Query!
Sexual Dysfunction
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Renal and Urogenital
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other renal and urogenital disorders
Query!
Mental Health
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other mental health disorders
Query!
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other reproductive health and childbirth disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Treatment: Drugs - Dapoxetine
Treatment: Drugs - PDE5I (phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor)
Experimental: Dapoxetine + PDE5I - Dapoxetine 30 mg to 60 mg tablets 1 to 3 hours before sexual activity prn (as needed) not to be taken more than once every 24 hours for 12 weeks + a PDE5I (phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor) prescribed prior to study entry for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Placebo comparator: Placebo + PDE5I - Placebo tablets identical in appearance to dapoxetine taken 1 to 3 hours before sexual activity prn (as needed) not to be taken more than once every 24 hours for 12 weeks + a PDE5I (phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor) prescribed prior to study entry for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Tablets identical in appearance to dapoxetine taken 1 to 3 hours before sexual activity prn (as needed) not to be taken more than once every 24 hours for 12 weeks.
Treatment: Drugs: Dapoxetine
30 mg to 60 mg tablets 1 to 3 hours before sexual activity prn (as needed) not to be taken more than once every 24 hours for 12 weeks.
Treatment: Drugs: PDE5I (phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor)
Patients were to be using a stable regimen of a PDE5-I (i.e., sildenafil, vardenafil, or tadalafil), as reported by the patient for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) for at least 3 months before screening and up to 12 weeks during treatment in the study.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
The Average Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) is the time it takes for a man to ejaculate during sexual intercourse (as measured by stopwatch). The data below show the average IELT measured in minutes at Baseline (before treatment) to Endpoint (after 12 weeks of treatment). In this study, patients took placebo or dapoxetine along with a stable dose of a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5I) prescribed prior to study entry for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
The Percentage of Patients Reporting At Least a 2-category Increase in Control Over Ejaculation
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's control over ejaculation on a 5-point scale from "Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, to Very Good." The percentage of patients who reported at least a 2-category increase in control over ejaculation is provided in the table below.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
At the end of treatment (Week 12)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
The Percentage of Patients Who Achieved 1-category or Greater Decrease (Improvement) in Personal Distress Related to Ejaculation
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of distress related to the speed of ejaculation on a 5-point scale from "Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, to Very Good." The percentage of patients who achieved 1-category or greater decrease (improvement) in personal distress related to the speed of ejaculation is provided in the table below.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
At Endpoint (After 12 weeks of treatment)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
The Percentage of Patients Reporting a Composite Score of At Least a 2-category Increase in Control Over Ejaculation and At Least a 1-category Decrease in Personal Distress
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of distress related to the speed of ejaculation and control over ejaculation on a 5-point scale from "Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, to Very Good." The percentage of patients who reported a composite score of at least a 2-category increase in control over ejaculation and at least a 1-category decrease (improvement) in personal distress is provided in the table below.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
At the end of treatment (Week 12)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
The Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a 1-category or Greater Increase in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of satisfaction with intercourse on a 5-point scale from "Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, to Very Good." The percentage of patients who achieved 1-category or greater increase in satisfaction with sexual intercourse is provided in the table below.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Endpoint (After 12 weeks of treatment)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
The Percentage of Patients Reporting At Least a "Better" Response to Treatment
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The "Clinical Global Impression of Change" (CGIC) was used to assess the degree of improvement the patient experienced with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with study drug on a 7-point scale from "Much worse, Worse, Slightly worse, No change, Slightly better, Better, to Much better". The percentage of patients who reported improvement in PE of at least "better" at Endpoint (after 12 weeks of treatment) is provided in the table below.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Endpoint (After 12 weeks of treatment)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
The Percentage of Patients Who Reported At Least a 1-category Decrease (Improvement) in Interpersonal Difficulty Related to Ejaculation
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation on a 5-point scale from "Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, to Very Good." The percentage of patients who reported at least a 1-category decrease (improvement) in interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation is provided in the table below.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Endpoint (After 12 weeks of treatment)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
The Percentage of Patients Reporting At Least a "Slightly Better" Response to Treatment
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The "Clinical Global Impression of Change" (CGIC) was used to assess the degree of improvement the patient experienced with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with study drug on a 7-point scale from "Much worse, Worse, Slightly worse, No change, Slightly better, Better, to Much better". The percentage of patients who reported improvement in PE of at least "slightly better" at Endpoint (after 12 weeks of treatment) is provided in the table below.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Endpoint (After 12 weeks of treatment)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of erectile dysfunction (ED), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score >=21 at screening and baseline, and receiving treatment with a stable regimen of a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE 5) inhibitor (ie, sildenafil, vardenafil, or tadalafil) for the treatment of ED for at least 3 months before screening
* Study participant in a stable, monogamous sexual relationship with the same woman for at least 6 months before screening and plan to maintain this relationship for the duration of the study
* Study participant medically stable (ie, in good general health) on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, 12 lead ECG, and clinical laboratory tests performed at screening
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* History suggestive of syncope (a condition characterized by a loss of consciousness)
* History of medical events such as surgical interventions or neurologic conditions (eg, multiple sclerosis), trauma, or infections that are associated with the development of symptoms of premature ejaculation (PE) and considered a potential cause of PE
* Current major psychiatric disorder such as mood disorder, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, mania, suicidal ideation, other psychotic disorder, or alcoholism
* Known allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)
* Taken another investigational drug (or vaccine) within 30 days or used an investigational medical device within 6 months before screening, or enrolled in another investigational study
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/04/2010
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2011
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
495
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Malvern
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
- Maroubra
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
- Perth
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
- St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Malvern
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Maroubra
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Ciudad Autonoma De
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Brussel
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Edegem
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Liège
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Garches
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Lille
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Lyon Cedex 03
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Lyon
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Marseille
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Nimes Cedex 9
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Toulouse
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Chunjoo
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Kwangjoo
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Pusan
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Kuala Lumpur N/A
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Kuala Lumpur
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Kuching
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Petaling Jaya
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Cd. De Mexico
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Culiacan
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Durango
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Monterrey
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Szcezecin
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
St Peterburg
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
St Petersburg
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
St. Petersburg
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Tao-Yuan
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Chipping Norton
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Leeds Yorkshire
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Lichfield
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Reading
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
South Brent
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dapoxetine compared to placebo in men with premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction who are currently being treated with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (ie, sildenafil, vardenafil, or tadalafil) for erectile dysfunction.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01063855
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
McMahon CG, Giuliano F, Dean J, Hellstrom WJ, Bull S, Tesfaye F, Sharma O, Rivas DA, Aquilina JW. Efficacy and safety of dapoxetine in men with premature ejaculation and concomitant erectile dysfunction treated with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor: randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III study. J Sex Med. 2013 Sep;10(9):2312-25. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12236. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
Query!
Address
0
0
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01063855
Download to PDF