Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03347396
Registration number
NCT03347396
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/11/2017
Date registered
20/11/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of BIVV009 (Sutimlimab) in Participants With Primary Cold Agglutinin Disease Who Have a Recent History of Blood Transfusion (Cardinal Study)
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Pivotal, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Sutimlimab in Patients With Primary Cold Agglutinin Disease Who Have a Recent History of Blood Transfusion
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
BIVV009-03
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
EFC16215
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Agglutinin Disease, Cold
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Anaemia
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Autoimmune diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - BIVV009
Experimental: BIVV009 - Participants with primary CAD who had a recent history of transfusion (defined as at least 1 transfusion during the last 6 months prior to screening) received an intravenous (IV) infusion of BIVV009 6.5 grams (g) (if body weight was less than \[\<\] 75 kilograms \[kg\]) or BIVV009 7.5 g (if body weight was greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 75 kg) on Day 0 and Day 7 and every 14 days thereafter in Part A up to Week 25. Participants who completed Part A per protocol through the end of treatment visit (Week 26) could continue to receive BIVV009 in Part B, every 2 weeks starting at Week 27 for up to an additional 149 weeks. All participants who completed Part A elected to continue in Part B.
Treatment: Drugs: BIVV009
Sutimlimab was administered as intravenous (IV) infusion.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Part A: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
A participant was considered a responder: if he or she did not receive a blood transfusion from Week 5 through Week 26 (end of treatment in Part A) and did not receive treatment for CAD beyond what was permitted per protocol. Additionally, the participant's hemoglobin (Hgb) level must meet either of the following criteria: Hgb level \>= 12 grams per deciliter (g/dL) at the treatment assessment endpoint (defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits), or Hgb increased \>= 2 g/dL from baseline (defined as the last Hgb value before administration of the first dose of study drug) at treatment assessment endpoint. Percentage of responders was calculated together with a 95% exact Clopper-Pearson confidence interval (CI).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From Week 5 through Week 26
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TESAEs was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent (TE) period (from the first investigational medicinal product \[IMP\] administration in Part B to the last IMP administration + 9 weeks follow up period).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Part B, 6.5 g cohort: From first dose (Week 27) up to 143 weeks of treatment + 9 weeks of follow-up (i.e., up to Week 179); Part B, 7.5 g cohort: From first dose (Week 27) up to 149 weeks of treatment + 9 weeks of follow-up (i.e., up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin Levels at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Mean change from baseline in bilirubin levels at the treatment assessment timepoint was reported in this outcome measure. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. Least squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) was assessed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) approach using heterogeneous Toeplitz (TOEPH) covariance matrix with change from baseline as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Score (Quality of Life) at Treatment Assessment Timepoint
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
FACIT-Fatigue scale consists of 13 questions assessed using a 5-point scale (0=not at all; 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much). Responses to each question were added to obtain a total score. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher score indicating more fatigue. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. LS mean and 95% CI was assessed by MMRM approach using TOEPH covariance matrix with change from baseline as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Mean change from baseline in LDH at the treatment assessment timepoint is reported in this outcome measure. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. LS mean and 95% CI was assessed by MMRM approach using TOEPH covariance matrix with change from baseline as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline, treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Part A: Number of Blood Transfusions Per Participant
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
A participant was to receive a transfusion if his or her Hgb level met either of the following criteria: Hgb was \<9 g/dL and the participant had symptoms of anemia or Hgb was \<7 g/dL and the participant was asymptomatic. Number of transfusions after the first 5 weeks of study drug administration and up to Week 26 are reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From Week 5 up to Week 26
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Part A: Number of Blood Units Transfused Per Participant
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
A participant was to receive a transfusion if his or her Hgb level met either of the following criteria: -Hgb was \<9 g/dL and the participant had symptoms of anemia or Hgb was \<7 g/dL and the participant was asymptomatic. Number of blood units transfused after the first 5 weeks of study drug administration and up to Week 26 are reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From Week 5 up to Week 26
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Mean change from baseline (Week 0) in Hgb at treatment assessment timepoint is reported in this outcome measure. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. LS mean and 95% CI was assessed by MMRM approach using TOEPH covariance matrix with change from baseline as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Part B: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at Each Specified Time Points
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Change From Hgb level from baseline (Week 0) at each specified time points (i.e., Weeks 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175 and early termination/safety follow up \[ET/SFU\] Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175, ET/SFU (up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Part B: Change From Baseline in Bilirubin Levels at Each Specified Time Points
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Change from baseline (Week 0) in bilirubin levels at each specified time point (i.e., Weeks 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175, ET/SFU (up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Part B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Score (Quality of Life) at Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and Early Termination (ET) Visit/Safety Follow-up Visit
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
FACIT-Fatigue scale consists of 13 questions assessed using a 5-point scale (0=not at all; 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much). Responses to each question were added to obtain a total score. The Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher score indicating more fatigue. Baseline (Week 0) was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Part B: Change From Baseline in 12-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at Each Specified Time Points
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
SF-12: 12 item-questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) contained 12 items, categorized into 8 domains (subscales) of functioning and well-being: physical functioning, role-physical, role emotional, mental health, bodily pain, general health, vitality and social functioning, with each domain score ranged from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health). Higher scores = good health condition. These 8 domains were further summarized into 2 summary scores, PCS and MCS for which, score ranged 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health). Higher scores = better HRQOL. Baseline (Week 0) was defined as the last non-missing value prior to first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185). Change from baseline in SF-12 PCS and MCS scores is reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Part B: Change From Baseline in 5-level European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Utility Index and VAS Scores at Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU Visit
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
EQ-5D-5L:standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response option: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems measured with Likert scale. EQ-5D-5L responses relating to 5 dimensions are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score=better health state. The EQ-5D-5L VAS rated participant's current health state on a scale from 0=worst imaginable health state to 100 =best imaginable health state. Baseline (Week 0): last non-missing value prior to first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Part B: Number of Participants With Response to Participant's Global Impression of (Fatigue) Severity (PGIS) Questionnaire at Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and at ET Visit/SFU Visit
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The PGIS is a self-reported scale. The PGIS is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of disease severity using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1=none, 2= mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe, 5=very severe. Higher scores indicated greater severity. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
At Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and at ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Part B: Number of Participants With Response to Participant's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and at ET Visit/SFU Visit
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
PGIC is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening compared to the start of the study. PGIC was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGIC scores as follows: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse and 7=very much worsen. Higher scores indicated greater severity. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
At Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and at ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Part B: Mean Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Level at Each Specified Time Points
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Mean change from baseline in LDH levels at each specified time points (i.e., Weeks 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline (Week 0) was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175, ET/SFU (up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Part B: Number of Blood Transfusions Per Participant
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
A participant was to receive a transfusion if his or her Hgb level met either of the following criteria: Hgb was \<9 g/dL and the participant had symptoms of anemia or Hgb was \<7 g/dL and the participant was asymptomatic.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
From Week 27 up to 149 weeks of treatment (i.e., up to Week 176)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Part B: Number of Blood Units Transfused Per Participant
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
A participant was to receive a transfusion if his or her Hgb level met either of the following criteria: Hgb was \<9 g/dL and the participant had symptoms of anemia or Hgb was \<7 g/dL and the participant was asymptomatic.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
From Week 27 up to 149 weeks of treatment (i.e., up to Week 176)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Part B: Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Values at Each Specified Time Points
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Change in Haptoglobin values from baseline at each specified time points (i.e., Weeks 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185). Haptoglobin values \<0.2 were imputed as 0.2.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41,43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175, ET/SFU (up to Week 185)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Part B: Number of Healthcare Visits by Type
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
In this outcome measure, number of healthcare visits which included non-study healthcare resource utilization visit (consisted mainly of extra visits to the office of the study doctor, or visit to a generalist doctor, or visit to a specialist doctor) and hospitalization visit and visit to hospital emergency is reported.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
From Week 27 up to 149 weeks of treatment (i.e., up to Week 176)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Body weight of >= 39 kg at screening.
* Confirmed diagnosis of primary CAD based on the following criteria: a) Chronic hemolysis; b) Polyspecific direct antiglobulin test (DAT) positive; c) Monospecific DAT strongly positive for C3d; d) Cold agglutinin titer >= 64 at 4 degree celsius; e) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) DAT less than or equal to (<=) 1+, and f) No overt malignant disease.
* History of at least one documented blood transfusion within 6 months of enrollment.
* Hemoglobin level <= 10.0 g/dL.
* Bilirubin level above the normal reference range, including participants with Gilbert's Syndrome.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Cold agglutinin syndrome secondary to infection, rheumatologic disease, or active hematologic malignancy.
* Clinically relevant infection of any kind within the month preceding enrollment (e.g., active hepatitis C, pneumonia).
* Clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus; or other autoimmune disorders with anti-nuclear antibodies at Screening. Anti-nuclear antibodies of long-standing duration without associated clinical symptoms adjudicated on a case-by-case basis during the Confirmatory Review of Patient Eligibility.
* Positive hepatitis panel (including hepatitis B surface antigen and/or hepatitis C virus antibody) prior to or at Screening.
* Positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody at screening.
* Treatment with rituximab monotherapy within 3 months or rituximab combination therapies (e.g., with bendamustine, fludarabine, ibrutinib, or cytotoxic drugs) within 6 months prior to enrollment.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/03/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/10/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
24
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
USC Health Clinics - Buderim
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Ballarat Oncology & Haematology - Ballarat
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Monash Medical Centre - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
4556 - Buderim
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
3350 - Ballarat
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Vienna
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Antwerpen
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
La Louvière
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Edmonton
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Caen
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Créteil
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Lyon
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Ulm
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Netanya
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Tel Aviv
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Brescia
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Milan
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Rome
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Vicenza
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Saitama-Ken
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Tokyo-To
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Bergen
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Oslo
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Trondheim
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Leeds
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
London
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Bioverativ, a Sanofi company
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of Part A was to determine whether sutimlimab administration resulted in a greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 grams per deciliter (g/dL) increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) levels or increased Hgb to \>= 12 g/dL and obviated the need for blood transfusion during treatment in participants with primary cold agglutinin disease (CAD) who had a recent history of blood transfusion. The purpose of Part B was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of sutimlimab in participants with CAD.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03347396
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Alexander Röth, Wilma Barcellini, Shirley D'Sa, Yoshitaka Miyakawa, Catherine M Broome, Marc Michel, David J. Kuter, Bernd Jilma, Tor Henrik Anderson Tvedt, Stella Lin, Xiaoyu Jiang, Caroline Reuter, William Hobbs, Sigbjørn Berentsen; Inhibition of Complement C1s with Sutimlimab in Patients with Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD): Results from the Phase 3 Cardinal Study. Blood 2019; 134 (Supplement_2): LBA-2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2019-132490 Roth A, Barcellini W, Tvedt THA, Miyakawa Y, Kuter DJ, Su J, Jiang X, Hobbs W, Arias JM, Shafer F, Weitz IC. Sutimlimab improves quality of life in patients with cold agglutinin disease: results of patient-reported outcomes from the CARDINAL study. Ann Hematol. 2022 Oct;101(10):2169-2177. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-04948-y. Epub 2022 Aug 23. Erratum In: Ann Hematol. 2024 May;103(5):1803. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-05709-9. Tvedt THA, Steien E, Ovrebo B, Haaverstad R, Hobbs W, Wardecki M, Tjonnfjord GE, Berentsen SA. Sutimlimab, an investigational C1s inhibitor, effectively prevents exacerbation of hemolytic anemia in a patient with cold agglutinin disease undergoing major surgery. Am J Hematol. 2022 Feb 1;97(2):E51-E54. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26409. Epub 2021 Dec 11. No abstract available. Roth A, Barcellini W, D'Sa S, Miyakawa Y, Broome CM, Michel M, Kuter DJ, Jilma B, Tvedt THA, Fruebis J, Jiang X, Lin S, Reuter C, Morales-Arias J, Hobbs W, Berentsen S. Sutimlimab in Cold Agglutinin Disease. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1323-1334. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027760.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Clinical Sciences & Operations
Query!
Address
0
0
Sanofi
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/96/NCT03347396/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/96/NCT03347396/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Alexander Röth, Wilma Barcellini, Shirley D'Sa, Yo...
[
More Details
]
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03347396