Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00405587
Registration number
NCT00405587
Ethics application status
Date submitted
28/11/2006
Date registered
30/11/2006
Date last updated
22/08/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
Safety Study of PLX4032 in Patients With Solid Tumors
Query!
Scientific title
A Study to Assess Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of PLX4032 in Patients With Solid Tumors
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
PLX06-02
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Malignant Melanoma
0
0
Query!
Colorectal Carcinoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Malignant melanoma
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - PLX4032
Experimental: PLX4032 - Open-label, sequential dose escalation
Treatment: Drugs: PLX4032
Oral capsules administered BID
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Peak Concentration (Cmax) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Peak Concentration (Cmax) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose on Day 15, pre-morning dose on Day 16
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, pre-morning dose on Day 16
Query!
Primary outcome [7]
0
0
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Query!
Primary outcome [8]
0
0
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Query!
Primary outcome [9]
0
0
Mean RO5185426 Accumulation Ratios - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Accumulation ratio is the ratio of AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 15 / AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 1.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Day 1 and Day 15: pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose
Query!
Primary outcome [10]
0
0
Mean RO5185426 Accumulation Ratios - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Accumulation ratio is the ratio of AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 15 / AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 1.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Day 1 and Day 15: pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose
Query!
Primary outcome [11]
0
0
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Query!
Primary outcome [12]
0
0
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, and pre-morning dose on Day 16
Query!
Primary outcome [13]
0
0
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Query!
Primary outcome [14]
0
0
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, and pre-morning dose on Day 16
Query!
Primary outcome [15]
0
0
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Query!
Primary outcome [16]
0
0
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Query!
Primary outcome [17]
0
0
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Query!
Primary outcome [18]
0
0
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15 and pre-morning dose on Day 16
Query!
Primary outcome [19]
0
0
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- CRC
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Query!
Primary outcome [20]
0
0
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- CRC
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, and pre-morning dose on Day 16
Query!
Primary outcome [21]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed and an Unconfirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version (v) 1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
BOR of confirmed /unconfirmed (total) response was defined as CR or PR recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v 1.0 criteria. For target lesions (TLs), CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline (BL) sum of longest diameters. For non-target lesions (NTLs), CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than four weeks after the criteria for response are first met. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Query!
Primary outcome [22]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than four weeks after the criteria for response are first met Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Query!
Primary outcome [23]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Query!
Primary outcome [24]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Duration of CR or PR Using RECIST v 1.0 - Extension BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Duration of response for participants with confirmed CR or PR was the period of time measured between the date that the criteria for objective CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) was met, and the first date that recurrent or PD was objectively documented (or death if before progression). PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of TLs taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s). In the event of no disease progression or documented death prior to study termination, analysis cutoff, or initiation of confounding anticancer therapy, duration of response was censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Using RECIST v 1.0 - Melanoma Extension Cohort
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
PFS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the appearance of new metastatic lesions, objective tumor progression, or death if before progression. PD was defined according to the RECIST criteria (v 1.0) as increase by at least 20% in the sum of the longest diameters of each TL, taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters, reported since the start of treatment, or appearance of one or more new lesions. For Non-TLs, PD was defined as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Month 1, 3, 4, 6, 9, and Last event (350) days
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
PFS Using RECIST v1.0 - Extension BRAFV600E Positive Melanoma
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
PFS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the appearance of new metastatic lesions, objective tumor progression, or death if before progression. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of TLs taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s). For Non-TLs, disease progression was defined as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. In the event of no disease progression or documented death prior to study termination, analysis cutoff, or start of confounding anticancer therapy, PFS was censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 421 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Died - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to 444 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
OS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the death. In the event of no death prior to study termination or analysis data cutoff, OS was censored at the last known date that the patient was alive as documented on the follow-up case report form. If this date was not available, then the last known alive date from the database was used.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to 444 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Time to CR or PR Using RECIST v1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Time to CR or PR was defined as the interval between the date of the first treatment to the date of the first documentation of confirmed CR or PR whichever occurred first, and not the date of confirmation at the subsequent tumor assessment. Time to response = Date of first response - initial dose date + 1.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Screening, BL, and up to 168 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Mean Dose-Normalized Steady-State AUC of RO5185426 80 mg and 120 mg Capsules - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation and Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Mean Dose-Normalized Steady-State Cmax of RO5185426 80 mg and 120 mg Capsules - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation and Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1 and 15, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8, and Day 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Decrease in Tumor Uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Tumor uptake of FDG was assessed by means of positron-emission tomography (PET)
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
BL and Day 15
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Cmax of RO5185426 - Food Effect
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1 and 15, pre-morning dose on Day 2, Day 8, and Day 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Tumor Levels of Phosphorylated Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinapse (ERK), Cyclin D1, and Ki-67
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The immunohisto-chemical analyses of the expression of phosphorylated ERK, cyclin D1, and Ki-67 in tumor-biopsy specimens was performed using hematoxylin and eosin staining.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
BL and Day 15
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Solid tumors confirmed histologically whose tumors are refractory to standard therapy, or for whom standard or curative therapy does not exist
* Patients from whom paired melanoma biopsies are planned must have a V600E+ BRAF mutation confirmed prior to the administration of PLX4032
* Previous chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to starting PLX4032 therapy, and all associated toxicity must be resolved prior to administration of PLX4032
* Patients in the Extension cohorts (melanoma or adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum) must have both a V600E+ BRAF mutation and measurable disease (by RECIST V 1.0 criteria) prior to the administration of PLX4032. All patients enrolled must provide archival or fresh melanoma tumor biopsy for confirmation of V600E+ BRAF mutation status by TaqMan assay
* ECOG performance status 0 or 1
* Life expectancy = 3 months
* Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Brain metastases that are progressing or have been documented to be stable for less than 3 months, or for which systemic corticosteroids are required
* Investigational drug use within 28 days of the first dose of PLX4032
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
* Refractory nausea and vomiting, malabsorption, or significant bowel resection that would preclude adequate absorption
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 1
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/11/2006
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/02/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
109
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3002 - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Parkville
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Plexxikon
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Roche Pharma AG
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary objective of this FIH study is to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of PLX4032 in patients with solid tumors. The secondary objective is to assess the pharmacodynamic activity in paired biopsy specimens obtained from patients with malignant melanoma who have the V600E BRAF oncogenic mutation.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00405587
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, Ribas A, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, O'Dwyer PJ, Lee RJ, Grippo JF, Nolop K, Chapman PB. Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 26;363(9):809-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002011. Kopetz S, Desai J, Chan E, Hecht JR, O'Dwyer PJ, Maru D, Morris V, Janku F, Dasari A, Chung W, Issa JP, Gibbs P, James B, Powis G, Nolop KB, Bhattacharya S, Saltz L. Phase II Pilot Study of Vemurafenib in Patients With Metastatic BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4032-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2497. Epub 2015 Oct 12. Puzanov I, Amaravadi RK, McArthur GA, Flaherty KT, Chapman PB, Sosman JA, Ribas A, Shackleton M, Hwu P, Chmielowski B, Nolop KB, Lin PS, Kim KB. Long-term outcome in BRAF(V600E) melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib: Patterns of disease progression and clinical management of limited progression. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jul;51(11):1435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 May 13. Su F, Viros A, Milagre C, Trunzer K, Bollag G, Spleiss O, Reis-Filho JS, Kong X, Koya RC, Flaherty KT, Chapman PB, Kim MJ, Hayward R, Martin M, Yang H, Wang Q, Hilton H, Hang JS, Noe J, Lambros M, Geyer F, Dhomen N, Niculescu-Duvaz I, Zambon A, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Preece N, Robert L, Otte NJ, Mok S, Kee D, Ma Y, Zhang C, Habets G, Burton EA, Wong B, Nguyen H, Kockx M, Andries L, Lestini B, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Troy JL, Gonzalez R, Hutson TE, Puzanov I, Chmielowski B, Springer CJ, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, Lo RS, Ribas A, Marais R. RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):207-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105358.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Henry Hsu, MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Plexxikon
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, Ribas A, McArthur ...
[
More Details
]
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00405587
Download to PDF